Endometriosis Excision Surgeon

Dr. Mark Dassel

Salt Lake City (Murray), Utah


Strengths

  • Former Director of the Center of Endometriosis at Cleveland Clinic
  • Extensive experience with complex deep infiltrating endo (bowel, bladder, diaphragm, ureters)
  • Excision is his primary approach, confirmed by Nancy
  • Multidisciplinary team in place (colorectal, uro, building toward thoracic)
  • Strong endo research and surgical teaching record
  • Patients consistently describe feeling heard, not rushed, and given real options

Worth Knowing

  • Long waits to be seen, often months
  • Referrals reported denied or lost without notification, front desk criticized
  • Recommends hormonal suppression after surgery, which may not suit patients seeking excision alone

Dr. Dassel is quietly one of the more experienced complex endo surgeons out there, and doesn't do much to advertise it. What stands out isn't where he trained, it's what he actually does: published surgical work on some of the hardest kinds of endo there are, including bowel, bladder, and diaphragm, and a consultant team built around him so complex cases get the right specialists in the room. The reviews are remarkably consistent, with patients from his Cleveland Clinic years through 2025 saying the same things, that he listens, he doesn't rush, he gives options instead of deciding for the patient, and he takes the disease seriously. Excision is his primary treatment, confirmed by Nancy after an old misunderstanding got cleared up.

The thing to know going in is access. Getting an appointment is hard, the wait can run months, a referral is required, and a few patients have had referrals denied or lost without anyone telling them, which looks like a front-office problem rather than anything about his care.

Patterns Across Patient Feedback


Positive pattern

Mixed or notable

Recurring concern

A strong and consistent pattern of feeling heard and taken seriously appears across Healthgrades, BirdEye, Reddit, and patient community sources including Nancy's Nook, spanning the Cleveland Clinic years through 2025. Accounts repeatedly describe long appointments, often ninety minutes to two hours, thorough explanations in plain language, and validation after years of dismissal by other providers.

Many accounts describe options-based, autonomy-centered care. Patients report being given clear choices, having decisions respected rather than made for them, and feeling like partners in treatment, including support for individual decisions about fertility and about the ovaries and fallopian tubes.

Multiple accounts describe meaningful symptom relief after excision, including complex Stage IV and deep infiltrating cases, with several patients reporting noticeable improvement within weeks of surgery.

Appointments often run long and can start late. In one Nancy's Nook account from 2022, a consultation began over an hour late, which the patient attributed to the nearly two hours spent in the room once it started. This is consistently framed as a reflection of thoroughness, but it is worth knowing for scheduling expectations.

The treatment approach pairs excision with hormonal suppression and, in select cases, hysterectomy. Most accounts describe this as options-based and respectful of patient choice. One 2025 account felt the approach leaned more hormone-positive than expected, reporting that research presented to contradict hormonal therapy was waved off and that a request for repeat excision was redirected toward pelvic floor therapy. Noted in a minority of accounts and included here as a possible mismatch for patients seeking excision-only, suppression-free care.

Access and wait times are a recurring concern. Across Reddit in 2024, Nancy's Nook in 2022, and BirdEye in 2026, accounts describe the practice as very difficult to get into, with waits commonly running months and few cancellations because of high demand.

Referral handling draws repeated criticism. Two 2026 BirdEye accounts report referrals that were denied or left pending without notification and learned about only later, and one describes rude phone staff. A referral is required to be seen, which is noted by patients attempting to self-refer.

A Primary Focus Within a Minimally Invasive and Chronic Pelvic Pain Practice

Endometriosis is a primary focus of the practice, situated within a broader minimally invasive gynecologic surgery and chronic pelvic pain program. After a fellowship in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery at the University of Louisville, the clinical work has centered on the diagnosis and surgical treatment of endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain. A prior role as Director of the Center of Endometriosis at Cleveland Clinic preceded the current position at Intermountain Medical Center in Murray, where a comprehensive minimally invasive and pelvic pain program is being developed in collaboration with another surgeon. Nancy's Nook lists Dr. Dassel as an excision specialist. The practice is not limited to pelvic pain alone, but endometriosis and complex pelvic pain are the stated clinical emphasis, including advanced and deep infiltrating disease.

Excision-First, Laparoscopic and Robotic

Surgery is performed using minimally invasive techniques, both laparoscopic and robotic. Excision is the stated primary approach to endometriosis. In a 2018 letter shared through Nancy's Nook, excision was described as the core of surgical treatment, and Nancy's Nook confirmed in 2021 that excision remained the primary approach after an earlier misunderstanding had suggested otherwise.

Published surgical-video work demonstrates resection of deep infiltrating endometriosis involving the ureters, bladder, and rectovaginal septum, as well as bowel and diaphragmatic disease. The general approach favors removing disease where it is found, while weighing how aggressive surgery should be against the risks of operating on the bowel, bladder, diaphragm, and ureters.

Ask directly

  • Do you use robotic or manual laparoscopy, and does that vary by case?

Deep Infiltrating Disease, Adenomyosis, and Fertility Planning

Documented surgical experience includes deep infiltrating endometriosis of the bowel, including segmental resection of ileocolic disease, bladder endometriosis with neocystotomy and repair, diaphragmatic endometriosis, and disease encasing the ureters. Removal of endometriomas and ovarian cysts and the management of adenomyosis are also part of the surgical scope. Fertility is addressed within treatment planning, with coordination with reproductive endocrinology when surgery and fertility goals intersect, and patient accounts describe respect for individual choices about the ovaries and fallopian tubes.

Consultants for Complex Cases and On-Site Pelvic Floor PT

A multidisciplinary team is in place for complex cases. Nancy's Nook reports that a colorectal surgeon and a urologist have been added as consultants, with a thoracic surgeon being sought for cases involving disease outside the pelvis. Pelvic floor physical therapy is treated as a central part of evaluation and treatment, and patient accounts describe a pelvic floor physical therapist being brought directly into examinations. Coordination with reproductive endocrinology supports fertility-related decisions, and care coordination, nurse triage, and pain psychology are described as part of the overall approach to chronic pelvic pain.

History and Exam First, With Imaging Treated as Limited

A detailed history and a thorough physical examination are described as central to the diagnostic process, with extended first appointments used to map the full range of possible pain generators. Standard imaging is treated as limited. Patient accounts consistently describe reassurance that a negative ultrasound or MRI does not rule out endometriosis, including direct statements of confidence in the diagnosis despite negative scans.

Published research has examined the use of site-specific peritoneal biopsies to diagnose endometriosis in a pelvis that appears normal during laparoscopy. MRI read by specific radiologists is ordered in some cases. Nancy's Nook notes a preference for patients to arrive with an established diagnosis, which is worth knowing for those earlier in the diagnostic process.

Peer-Professional and Institution-Affiliated, Not Self-Run Patient Education

Public presence is primarily peer-professional and institution-affiliated rather than self-run patient education. Published endometriosis research includes work on site-specific peritoneal biopsies for diagnosis and surgical-video publications on bladder, diaphragmatic, ileocolic, and deep infiltrating disease, along with a needs assessment on chronic pelvic pain education within minimally invasive gynecologic surgery fellowships.

Appearances include the BackTable OBGYN podcast, a peer-facing surgical discussion of chronic pelvic pain, and the Mountain Land Pelvic Health Podcast, produced through a physical therapy partnership and also released on YouTube. A spotlight interview was produced by Reborn Pelvic Health and Wellness. A 2019 SELF Magazine article quoted Dr. Dassel as an expert on endometriosis pain management during the Cleveland Clinic years.

Roles include board membership with the International Pelvic Pain Society, educational involvement with the minimally invasive gynecologic surgery fellowship, a speaker listing at the Mountain Land Pelvic Summit, and a 2020 presentation on diaphragmatic endometriosis at the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons. No appearances on patient-facing endometriosis podcasts were found, and no personally run patient-education social media accounts were identified.

Continued Follow-Up, With Hormonal Suppression Generally Recommended

Patient accounts describe close and continued follow-up after surgery, including a stated commitment to following endometriosis patients until both patient and surgeon agree that treatment is adequate. Post-operative reviews across several months describe ongoing troubleshooting of residual pain, coordination of pelvic floor physical therapy, trigger point and botox injections, and medication adjustments.

Hormonal suppression after surgery is generally recommended as a way to slow regrowth and prolong relief, with the reasoning that suppression holds disease in check but does not remove it. This is framed as a quality-of-life decision rather than a requirement, and accounts describe a willingness to forgo suppression when it is poorly tolerated. Patients who are specifically seeking surgery without any hormonal suppression should discuss this directly, since the standard recommendation leans toward post-surgical suppression for most patients.

Excision as the Foundation, Treated Alongside Overlapping Pain Generators

The stated philosophy treats excision as the foundation of surgical endometriosis care, combined with other tools aimed at pain, organ function, fertility, and quality of life. Endometriosis is described as one trigger among overlapping pain generators, and the approach emphasizes treating the whole picture, including pelvic floor dysfunction, bladder and bowel pain, and central or neuropathic pain, rather than endometriosis in isolation.

Shared decision-making and patient autonomy are emphasized strongly across accounts, with options laid out and individual choices respected, including aggressive removal of disease at a patient's request and decisions around fertility. In select cases driven by refractory bleeding or adenomyosis, hysterectomy is considered as one option rather than a default. Patients seeking strictly excision-only care without hormonal suppression may find this combined approach a mismatch, and it is worth weighing directly.

Ask directly

  • What percentage of your surgical cases involve endometriosis?
  • If adenomyosis is found during surgery, how do you handle that in a patient who wants to preserve fertility?
Submit Feedback

FAQ

Why did you make this directory?

Who you choose for your surgeon matters more than most people realize. The wrong surgeon can mean missed disease, unnecessary surgeries, and years of pain that didn't have to happen. This is what happened to me.

Finding the right one is not a guarantee, but can drastically improve the outcome of your surgery. This directory pulls together publicly available information and patient-reported patterns in one place, so you can walk into a consultation prepared.

Where did you find this information?

This directory was built using publicly available information from a wide range of sources, including surgeon websites, medical publications, advocacy resources, social media, and submissions from my social media community.

If they show on this list, it means a surface-level check confirmed endometriosis is a primary focus of their practice.. Once their name is linked to a profile, it means I have completed and published my deeper independent research on that surgeon.

What is an endo specialist?

A specialist is a surgeon whose practice centers on endometriosis and/or complex pelvic conditions, including fibroids, adenomyosis, pelvic pain, and similar conditions, as a primary focus rather than as one service among a general gynecology or obstetrics practice.

How do you decide who is on the list?

Inclusion criteria:

A surgeon is eligible if they publicly identify, or are publicly identified, as a specialist through any of the following:

  • Practice website
  • Public facing profiles (Doximity, hospital profiles, etc)
  • Social media bio or consistent social content
  • Inclusion on other endo specific directories: iCareBetter, Nancy’s Nook, Yellow Hub listing

Exclusion criteria:

A surgeon is excluded if public information indicates endometriosis is not a primary focus of their practice:

  • Their public profile presents them primarily as a general OB/GYN or obstetrician with endometriosis listed incidentally among many services
  • No public source positions them as a specialist,  they surface only through patient referral tips or self submission with no verifiable public identity as an endo surgeon
Can a surgeon be removed from the directory?

Surgeons are included on the list based on the criteria listed above.

Personal conduct, social media behavior, and online controversy are not criteria for inclusion or removal. The directory exists to help patients find skilled surgeons, not to weigh in on personality or public opinion.

A surgeon could be removed if I find loss of medical license, or strong evidence they are not a specialist.

Why isn't my surgeon listed?

Absence from this directory doesn't mean a surgeon is unqualified. It means I either haven't found them yet, or couldn't find enough public information to confirm that endometriosis as a genuine focus of their practice. The directory is a living resource and will keep growing with your help.

Use the "submit feedback" button above to suggest a surgeon for review or share your experience with a surgeon.

Can I suggest a surgeon?

Yes, please! Use the "submit feedback" button above.

A submission is a request for consideration, not a guarantee of inclusion. Every surgeon goes through the same research process regardless of how they came to our attention, whether that's a patient suggestion, a surgeon submitting themselves, or my own research. The information found is the information published, good or bad.

I have a surgery coming up but the surgeon profile isn't ready!

Send me a message on Instagram or TikTok (@wulfwomen), I am happy to skip ahead and help research your surgeon before your surgery date. <3

If the surgeon you're looking for doesn't meet the criteria, I will let you know. If they do, I will create the full profile and publish it here on this page.

How often is this updated?

I plan to go through the list every three months and make updates. I hope to add feedback as I get it, but I am only one person and it may take some time.

What should I do if information in a profile is wrong?

Please email me at deb@wulfwomen.com and let me know. Correcting inaccurate information is at the top of my priority list.

I really appreciate all feedback and more eyes on this. I've worked very hard to make sure this is accurate, but there is always a chance something could slip through. I review all submissions and make corrections as quickly as I can.

There's no surgeon in my city or state!

Check out the surgeons in your neighboring states. Many them operate out of multiple locations.

How do you collect patient feedback?

Patient feedback is pulled from publicly available sources like reviews and community forums. Some feedback is submitted directly to me via the "submit feedback" button above.

I take this feedback and fold it into the summaries in the profiles, rather than including every review word for word.

Why are some profiles more detailed than others?

Profile depth reflects what's publicly available, not the quality of the surgeon. That said, a sparse profile is worth paying attention to. Surgeons who specialize in endometriosis tend to have a presence in the patient community. If a profile is thin on reviews and information, that's a sign to do more research and ask a ton of questions.

Is this directory AI-assisted?

Yes, and I'll be upfront about it. I could not have built this without AI.

I am doing the research on each surgeon, then asking AI to check the internet for search for additional public sources.

Then, I ask AI to help with the first draft of the profile content. I read it and fix it manually to make sure it's accurate based on my research.

Lastly, I ask AI to build the code for me to make the profiles look nice on the website.

How is this different from Nancy's Nook or iCareBetter?

I have the utmost respect for Nancy's Nook, she helped me find my specialist. I have had her page listed on my website for a year now, but noticed very few people are clicking the link I provided. The younger generations aren't using facebook as much as we used to and I wanted something easier to access for all ages.

I also wanted to provide a service that could pull information from all over the internet and make it easy to view in one place.

iCareBetter has great information, but much of the information on there is surgeon submitted or sponsored. The Wulf Women list is a place for all information to be found, regardless of where it came from.

Do you make money from this directory?

No. I will never accept payment from any surgeon listed here, and this directory does not generate income for me.

Who are you?

My name is Debrah (Deb) Stark. I'm an endo patient who learned the hard way how important specialty care is. I promised myself after my second surgery I would do everything I could to help other women navigate endometriosis care. My mission is to give women enough information to help them make the right medical decisions for themselves.

You can find me on TikTok and Instagram as @wulfwomen .

“For the strength of the Pack is the Wolf, and the strength of the Wolf is the Pack.”
-Rudyard Kipling,The Jungle Book